Class Mobs

Become smarter

Lime Crime; The Only Crime to Have!

Lime Crime is a vegan, cruelty-free cosmetics with the main store located in Los Angeles, California. It has been certified by PETA and Leaping Bunny in never being tested on animals. That’s just one great thing about this store, but when you glance at their site, you are hit by an explosion of color, and different products to meet your needs. The company was founded by Doe Deere, who wanted colors and make-up to match her rebellious personality, having launched her line in 2008. Her product is carried online, but in such stores as DollsKill, Planet Beauty, Amazon, and Dote, just to name a few. Lime Crime is sold globally, not just locally, and it has millions of fans.


Checking out the packaging was fun, as one of the newer products, called MI$F (moms I’d like to follow), comes in a four-color lip pack that looks like a pink cigarette box. They have rose tins of color combinations, pop on nails in funky shades, lip shades in metallic, diamond crushers, and matte. The company offers semi-permanent hair color in a plethora of shades that won’t damage your hair. They have highlighter palettes for your face, eyeshadow palettes for your eyes, and all come in gorgeous packaging. Make-up and hair care so colorful and dazzling, that you can easily channel your inner rebel.


The company also supports several charities and has given over $16,000 to them. They have given to the Red Cross, Adopt NY, which is a charity for animals forced to leave homes during Hurricane Sandy in NY, Girls, Inc., a charity program that educates and empowers young girls, Bideawee, the oldest no-kill animal shelter in the U.S., HOLA, an after school charity for kids in LA., and more.


The company offers gift cards, can get a student discount of 15% even on sale items, refer-a-friend discount of $5 when you spend $30, and there are other promotions and sales going on currently for Mother’s Day. The press on the company is fantastic, as they have been featured in such magazines as Elle, and Marie Claire, and websites such as Refinery29 and Popsugar to name a few. What’s not to love about Lime Crime?


Universities Struggle to Strike Perfect Balance on Free Speech

In a recent op-ed, Nicholas Dirks, Chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley, reveals the extreme difficulty he and his peers in the American University system face when dealing when problems surrounding the freedom of controversial speakers to address their campuses.


The most recent event to embattle Berkeley, often credited as the birthplace of the so-called Free Speech Movement of the 1960s, was the planned speech by right wing author Ann Coulter. Ms. Coulter was invited at the behest of the Berkeley student group Berkeley College Republicans, but her planned speech almost immediately ran into trouble.


First, the University couldn’t grant her access to the usual venues that are used to accommodate speakers on the campus. Mr. Dirks cited security threats as the primary reason for denying Ms. Coulter the ability to speak in one of the normal venues. Next, the University extended her an invitation to speak in the venue of her choice but at a time when fewer students would be around. This offer was rejected by Ms. Coulter, saying that scheduling her at times when students will not be present was an unacceptable abridgment of her first amendment rights.


Ms. Coulter went against the wishes of Mr. Dirks and the rest of the Berkeley administration, vowing to give the speech at the time and place of her choosing. This enraged many campus activists groups, prompting threats of violence, should the planned speech go forward. These threats finally caused the group that had invited her to withdraw their invitation. A group is now suing the university concerning the violation of the rights of students to hear Ms. Coulter speak.


All the while, Mr. Dirks insists that even his plan to provide Ms. Coulter with a suitable venue at an alternative, less crowded time would have set the university back tens of thousands of dollars.

Mikhail Blagosklonny Offers Modern Cancer Treatment through Target of Rapamycin

Mikhail Blagosklonny is a research scientist. He specializes in cancer research with the aim of finding treatment through therapies. For decades, cancer has been cited as one of the world’s leading problems in the medical sector. With the focus to fight the rising numbers of cancer patients, Mikhail has progressively made enormous contributions towards the cause. The cancer biology specialist has strong academic credentials in research. Some of his work has the magnitude of revolutionizing treatment therapies for cancer and aging. Blagosklonny is a prominent oncologist specializing in the research of molecular biology as well as cellular differentiations. He has published over 180 articles on cancer and the effects of some drugs on affected patients. Aside from that, Blagosklonny has co-authored many books on research reviews. His study includes the biology of cancerous cells and their cycle. Blagosklonny offers a clear insight into the beginning of cancer growth in the immune system. Read more on

TOR Signalling

In one of his studies, he discovered TOR signaling. TOR means the target of rapamycin. Blagosklonny states that the target of rapamycin plays a significant role in cell life longevity. This occurs when apoptosis is inhibited thereby delaying autophagy. The process also promotes cellular protein synthesis. These processes slow down aging. In return, all age related diseases reduce by a large percentage. This process contributes to the production of cancerous tumors. This means that a regulation of TOR signaling would help in treating cancer. A clear understanding of the scientific processes helps in generating efficient and effective drugs for the cure of cancer and age-related disease.

Education and Career

Mikhail Blagosklonny is not only a scientist but also a scholar. His work extends beyond research. Currently, he is an associate professor at Roswell Park Institute of Cancer Research. He was appointed in 2009. The appointment was based on his experiences in the medical field of research. The alumnus of the First Pavlov State Medical is a degree holder of science and biology. He is also the serving editor in chief of Oncotarget. This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. It offers insight on the treatment of cancer and other diseases. Read more about Mikhail at

High Stakes at Play In Campus Free Speech Fiascos

The country’s universities have been embroiled in controversy like at no time since the 1960s. The central theme to the diversity of disruptions that have plagued college campuses from East to West is the role that freedom of speech should play in the academy. It seems, more than anything, to be a battle between the politically correct and the unorthodox.

Some of these incidents have seemed trivial, even funny. Hate hoaxes, football players missing their own games at Division III schools that no one cares about, all of these things provide amusing fodder for bloggers and tabloid news sites. But for the administrators at the colleges where the brouhahas have unfolded, the stakes could not be higher.

In the case of the University of Missouri, the dean eventually lost his job. It all started when a teacher made comments that some deemed offensive, but which many regarded as constitutionally protected speech. Things escalated, with massive student protests, unrest on campus and the football season nearly being cancelled. The fired teacher has filed a lawsuit, seeking millions in damages against the university. Some observers think she has an iron-clad case.

However, the real devastation came the following semester. By early 2016, the University of Missouri’s applications had declined by a full 30 percent. Experts say that if the school can’t recover to its historically normal application numbers, it could face bankruptcy within just a few years.

Similar incidents have occurred at the University of California, Berkeley. There, a long series of riots have broken out on campus as a result of speakers showing up to give talks, some of whom were denied a platform to speak. That university is also facing a string of lawsuits and has been directly threatened by President Trump with losing all of its federal funding if it doesn’t get its act together.

Berkeley Administrators Put in Difficult Spot Amid Free Speech Concerns

The campus at the University of California, Berkeley has been embroiled in more unrest and general agitation that at any time since the 1960s. It was then that the fledgling Free Speech Movement was born out of radical student activists seeking to redress grievances, including the criminal war being waged in Vietnam.

Yet recently, it seems that the spirit of student activism has taken a completely 180 degree turn. While the student activists of today may look, at least in form, as their counterparts of the ’60s, they certainly do not resemble them in function. The new student activists seem to be, more than anything, against free speech. This is richly ironic, coming from the very birthplace of the movement bearing free speech in its name.

Nevertheless, one of the unrecognized victims of this upheaval is the administration of the college itself. In a recent op-ed, Nicholas Dirks, chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley, describes the difficult balancing act that he and his fellow administrators across the nation must skillfully execute. The case of the most recent planned speech of Ann Coulter is exemplary.

Ms. Coulter was scheduled to speak. The university could not guarantee the safety of all participants in the usual venues afforded to speakers, so she was offered a secure off-campus location in which to give her talk. She declined, saying the university was deliberately discriminating against her because of her viewpoint. She would have been forced to use a distant venue at a time when most students were not present.

The university attempted to negotiate with her but ultimately, she cancelled her speech. She then threatened to show up and give the talk anyway. This panicked the administration, which would have had to provide up to 100 police, costing tens of thousands. Ultimately, even that speech was cancelled. The university is currently being sued by a student group as a result of the final cancellation of the talk.

Benefits of Concessions in Sanitation Services

Through a partnership with BNDES, the government has decided that there will be some concessions to be made. The concessions will be of assistance to the sanitation, a part in which Edison Carlos is a part in. Through his institute known as Trata Brasil, he has been able to focus on the basic sanitation. It is in his belief that the conjunction will bring about lots of advantages to everyone since it will all be about the improvements to be made.


This will be a much better means through which there will be a decrease in wastes and also a much better means of bringing about special infrastructure projects. Since public power performs 90% of the sanitation within Brazil, the private initiative is a much better means through which there can be another form of management.


The government bodies will be able to offer more experience which will be needed in bringing about the required sanitation within Brazil and also bring in more companies which will get to be of some assistance. Furthermore, BNDES will be focused on providing customized action plans. These plans will ascertain that all states that are being served will be in the best conditions and also get to understand their situations much better.


About Felipe Montoro Jens


Felipe Montoro is an individual who is mostly involved within the finance market, due to this, he has been able to work on lots of investments over the years. This has enabled him to run his companies appropriately and also ascertained that he could become the man that he is today.


Being such a successful person, he has also aimed at assisting his employees and also guiding the in the right direction. Amongst some of the companies which he is an executive officer are AC Energia SA, Concessionaria Interoceanica Sur Tramo 3 SA, Concessionaria Interoceanica Sur Tramo 2, Concessionaria Travase Olmos, and Empresa de Generacion Huallaga SA.


Lime Crime Offers The Tools For Colorful Creative Self-Expression

Lime Crime is a makeup line created by former model, fashion designer and rock musician Doe Deere. The company has been an internet sensation from the start. People love that the brand offers makeup in the brightest, boldest colors imaginable and has the most creative names for its colors. People also love the fact all Lime Crime products are made from vegan ingredients and are never tested on animals and so are cruelty-free. Plus their products encourage freedom of in an industry that generally tries to get people to blend in.


Founded in 2008, this innovative cosmetics line offers lipstick, nail polish, eyeliner, eyeshadow, blush, rouge, hair dye, glitters, primer and a whole host of other radically colored beauty products. The products enable the wearer to make bold, expressive statements that show their individuality and their inner unicorn. Doe Deere created the cosmetics line when she couldn’t find makeup in colors loud enough for her to be seen on stage with her rock band. The brand has now been embraced by millions of people worldwide determined to make their own loud, colorful statements.


If you’re looking for a unique way to express yourself, consider the liquid eyeliner, metallic or matte Velvetines lipstick, Venus Palettes eyeshadow, Diamond Crushers

Iridescent Lip Topper, bold, opaque and recklessly bright Unicorn Lipstick, Unicorn hair dye in blazing bright colors, neon bright nail polish and dazzling pop on nails. With Lime Crime cosmetics you can make a loud statement without speaking. The brand is now popping up in boardrooms, business meeting, courts of law, schools and medical centers as highly-skilled professionals now dare to display their colorful inner unicorns.


When you’re ready to let your makeup do the talking and make a blindingly bright but socially conscious statement, this is the only brand of cosmetics you need to wear. Initially Doe Deere made her makeup by hand and shared it only with the select few that visited her online makeup tutorial. Today millions use the products and have turned it into a movement and a symbol of colorful, stylish self-expression. Are you bold enough to join?


Berkeley Free Speech Woes Are Microcosm of U.S. Universities

The University of California, Berkeley has had a tumultuous year. Multiple episodes of speakers being denied a platform on campus have led to an outcry from student groups and free speech activists across the nation. Masked rioters have spurred on counter rioters, who have shown up to some events on campus and in the town of Berkeley itself willing to do battle on behalf of freedom of speech. At times, these demonstrations have devolved into street brawls.

This atmosphere, almost revolutionary in character, has loomed over the recently planned speech that was to have been given by right-leaning author Ann Coulter. At first, the University declined to allow Ms. Coulter to speak in the usual venues and at the usual times that other speakers use due to concerns over unmanageable disruptions and potential violence. Ms. Coulter declined the university’s offer to speak at an off-campus location at a time when most students were not attending classes, claiming that the university was intentionally attempting to stifle her ability to reach a new audience.

There was a series of negotiations between Ms. Coulter and the university’s administration. But these ended at an impasse. Eventually, Ms. Coulter vowed to give her speech in the center of campus anyway, despite being warned not to do so by the college administration. But this put the university itself in a tricky position. It would still be responsible for any unrest or injuries that occurred to students, whether or not it had extended permission to Ms. Coulter to speak. But finally, amid increasing threats of violence from far-left radicals, the organization that had originally invited Ms. Coulter, the Berkeley College Republicans, rescinded its invitation to her. The University of California, Berkeley is, as a result, currently being sued in federal court by a student group claiming that its right to hear Ms. Coulter has been infringed.

Tough Questions for University Administors: Pay the Price or Risk Reputation?

The American university system has recently been beset with a series of contentious incidents involving the ability of speakers to present their arguments before the student bodies. From Berkeley to Middlebury, riots have erupted and egos have been bruised where simple college talks, which in times past would have gone off without a hitch, have become battlegrounds for hyper-polarized students and outside agitators.

Damned if they do, damned if they don’t

For administrators like Nicholas Dirks, chancellor of University of California, Berkeley, being notified by a student group that the likes of Milo Yiannopoulos or Ann Coulter have been invited to your campus can put you squarely between a rock and a hard place.

Both of those misfortunes have befallen Mr. Dirks, who once again made headlines recently when the planned speech of Ann Coulter, a right wing author, was cancelled amid threats of violence and unrest. Mr. Dirks contends that he did everything he could. But Ms. Coulter first ended up voluntarily cancelling her speech because she would not have been allowed to address students in any of the usual campus venues normally afforded to speakers. Mr. Dirks responds that the refusal to allow Ms. Coulter to use the usual venues was a result of simply not being able to guarantee the safety and security of anyone in attendance.

Even so, Mr. Dirks offered Ms. Coulter an alternate venue at an alternate time. Even this, had she agreed to accept it, would have cost the university tens of thousands of dollars as a result of being forced to hire an additional 100 policemen to keep the peace. Ultimately, the invitation for Ms. Coulter to speak was rescinded by the group that had originally invited her after it received continued threats of violence.

The university is currently facing a lawsuit from a student group alleging 1st Amendment violations.

University Administrators Walk Fine Line With Student Demonstrations

Universities throughout the United States have been recently besieged by a flurry of student demonstrations against causes ranging from unpopular speakers on campus to perceived unfairness against different identity groups. While such disturbances are nothing new to the U.S. higher education system, a system with a long and storied career of student activism, the tone, intensity and often the message of the new wave of activism is something that is largely unprecedented.

Mizzou looms large in every administrator’s mind

Recently, Nicholas Dirks, chancellor of University of California, Berkeley, wrote an op-ed where he attempted to clear the air and describe the travails he faces as an administrator who, on the one hand, is making every effort to protect the rights of students to speak and hear others speak but who also has a college to run, with a finite budget and real-world business considerations. Perhaps more than any other recent event, these episodes have brought into focus the challenging job that administrators face while running complex publicly funded organizations that nevertheless rely heavily on attracting the brightest students.

One event that has put things into stark relief for administrators facing potential student unrest is the case of the University of Missouri. In 2016, a liberal Mizzou professor was fired for speech that she believed was both protected and appropriate. Still, this was not enough for some Mizzou student activists. They created a huge uproar on campus, nearly leading to the cancellation of the entire football season. The melee drove a deluge of negative publicity about the school.

In addition to facing a million-dollar lawsuit filed by the former teacher, the University’s enrollment dropped by almost 30 percent the following semester. If Mizzou is unable to make up for that shortfall, the entire University could face bankruptcy within a few, short years. It is nightmare scenarios like this that keep college deans up at night.