Class Mobs

Become smarter

Randi Weingarten Opposes Betsy DeVos’ Appointment

The President of the American Federation of Teachers Union (AFTU) criticized Donald Trump’s choice for Secretary of Education. Randi Weingarten stated that Betsy DeVos was the most anti-public education nominee to be chosen in the department’s history. Weingarten said that DeVos is not qualified for the job. Moreover, she said that the businesswoman has no experience to serve in the powerful docket.


Weingarten continued by saying that DeVos’ attempts to privatize the education sector was a destructive move because it would negatively affect public schools and the success of children. She said these remarks at the National Press Club.


The union had endorsed Hillary Clinton for Presidency. Weingarten and Clinton have been personal allies for a long time. The union was critical of DeVos’ appointment because she has never served in a public school. Weingarten showed a lot of support of the new Every Student Succeeds Act that is set to replace the No Child Left Behind Act. Weingarten continued by saying that if DeVos’ confirmation was passed, she would oppose the new act. Her actions are likely to undermine public schools.


DeVos has been criticized heavily because her billionaire family has funded charter and private schools in the state of Michigan. In 2000, the DeVos Family was at the forefront of an initiative that was meant to allow students to attend private schools. The initiative was to be funded by taxpayers money. DeVos has also invested a lot of money in expanding charter schools in Detroit. Many people have criticized her support for charter schools in Michigan because they perform poorly on national tests.


Weingarten asked DeVos to spend more time and resources in public schools. DeVos’ confirmation is set to be postponed until the Office of Government Ethics reviews her financial holdings.


Why Ideas About Modern Education Fail to Work

An education researcher in Australia has reached a concerning conclusion about the state of education in Western societies. According to a news report published by National Public Radio, the researcher delved into a thousand ideas and concepts developed in the 20th century about education, and it turns out that these ideas have not worked very well in practice.


Professor John Hattie of the University of Melbourne explained that his longitudinal research looked at the academic lives of 250,000 students around the world. Professor Hattie identified five modern practices that are failing to get the desired effect:


1 – Achievement exams: Some of the most successful academic institutions in the world do not require too many standardized test from their students. It is more important to provide teachers with constant feedback to improve upon their profession and their classroom performance.


2 – Class size: Smaller classrooms are not as effective as they are believed to be. Some private and public classrooms in Japan comfortably sit 35 students and regularly get high marks from educational analysts. It is more important to train teachers adequately and to give them tools and feedback.


3 – Academic standards: Minimum academic standards can easily backfire because there will always be some students with learning disabilities while other will be gifted. Standards should only be set at the lower grades; after the third grade, the progress of students should be individual.


4 – School choice: Parents are often misguide in their decisions about the schools their children should attend. In the private school sphere, parents often fall for marketing schemes.


5 – Education budgets: Some of the best performing nations in terms of math, reading and science do not spend too much money on public education. The difference is that some countries encourage student-teacher collaboration to improve the classroom experience.

George Soros Leads Push to Reform the US Justice System

A new long term strategy by progressives and liberal donors to overhaul the US justice system through state prosecutor’s election has kick started. According to a report published on Politico on August 30, 2016 Democratic mega donor George Soros has taken the lead by redirecting his wealth to reshape the American justice system. The report reveals that the billionaire businessman, George Soros had channeled some $3 million of his own personal fortune to 7 top district attorney campaigns in 6 states during the just concluded 2016 US Elections. The push aims to find, train and finance candidates who will fight for criminal justice reforms on Forbes. The majority of district attorney’s position is held by incumbents who have not been keen on entrenching reforms.

Progressives realize that prosecutors exercise greater discretion and influence in the power scheme on The prosecutorial discretion gives them the power to decide on the charges and sentences to award defendants. Progressives have also seen the wisdom of pushing though the election agenda because of the recent events, which have seen many minorities, get a raw deal when in the corridors of justice. Case in point is the recent negative coverage centering on racial justice issues, such as those involving the killing of African Americans and rising alarm over the number of prisoners and punitive punishment of drug users. Reform groups have in the past advocated for fair legislation and criminal justice policies that would see the rates of incarceration rates drop but to little avail.

The shortcoming stemmed from a number of factors, among them the enduring push to harness the power of the attorney’s. A thorough look at the breakdown of the candidates supported by Soros shows several Hispanic and African America candidates who ran on platforms and ideals espoused by George Soros. The platform includes a push to redirect some drug offenders to diversionary programs and move to reduce the racial disparities in sentencing. In 2015, a research study conducted by the Carter group showed a great disparity in the racial make-up of elected local prosecutors; a total of 95% of all prosecutors in the US were white. Another study conducted by Wake Forest University revealed that up to 85% of prosecutors who run for office get re-elected unopposed.

The funds on released by Soros to various local district attorney races are channeled through various Super PACs operating at the local state level and 527, an unlimited money group that operates at the national level. In Florida, the group called The Florida Safety and Justice donated about $1.4 million to the low budget, Central Florida Democratic primary race for the attorney’s office. The donation was directed to the election of Aramis Ayala, a former prosecutor and public defender against the incumbent Jeff Ashton. Majority of this fund came from George Soros and his 527 group. In the district attorney’s race of 2015 at Caddo Parish in Louisiana; George Soros donated more than $930,000 to support the election of James Stewart, who beat his challenger, Dhu Thompson to the coveted seat.

California’s Cheap Community Colleges

California has many colleges and universities. However, not every student can attend them because they cannot afford to pay for their high tuition fees. Numerous community colleges are affordable. It is not advisable for students to take loans to pay for their tertiary education when they can easily attend community colleges. You should also remember that many community colleges have high acceptance rates and offer financial aid to the incoming students. Below is a list of the cheapest community colleges in California:


Cypress College

The college has approximately 16,000 students enrolled in their various degree programs. Cypress College charges a tuition fee of $1,135 per student. This amount is easily affordable. The college is an excellent choice for students seeking the traditional associate degree.


Las Positas College

The college has a population of 8,500 students. It is located in Livermore and covers 147 acres. Las Positas College charges $1,140 for tuition fees.


Yucaipa College

It is a great college for students seeking to pursue radiology courses. Many students earn a degree at the beginning of the year from Yucaipa College. Each student pays $1,126 as tuition fee. The college has enrolled approximately 5,549 students. It is also a great institution and a cheaper option for students taking political science.


Antelope Valley College

The college has enrolled 14,324 students. Its tuition fee stands at $1,114. Antelope Valley College is a good selection for honor programs. The school offers live discussions of important topics to enable the students to grasp concepts of critical issues.


Barstow Community College

It is a good institution for students interested in arts. The college recently opened a performing arts center. The tuition fee is $1,232. There are approximately 3,455 students enrolled in the institution

How Much Should a School District be Forced to Pay for Special Education?

Did you know that a critical court case involving education law is being argued in front of the Supreme Court? It’s true! The outcome of this case could change everything for school districts across America. Basically, the case involves the rights of disabled children. For example, it is considered unconstitutional to simply refuse to educate a student who has a disability. The school district is responsible for educating all students. This means school districts often have to hire additional staff and splurge for extra resources to help certain students.


For the most part, districts are happy to provide extra money for special education services. Naturally, this seems like the humane thing to do. However, a family in Colorado felt that the services the school district provided for their autistic son weren’t enough. In protest, they removed their son from the school, and they placed the student in a private school that employed a host of experts and plenty of resources for their son. Not surprisingly, the parents felt their son did much better in this private school.


The case before the Court is about who is supposed to pay for this expensive school. The tuition for the school exceeds $70,000 a year. The parents feel the school district must pay for the tuition, as they stress it is the school district’s responsibility to educate their son. The school district is arguing they already offered more than enough support, and it is not realistic to expect the school district to pay for such an expensive school based upon the preferences of the parents and their child.


So far, the justices seem to struggling as to how to rule. They understand students should be helped, but school districts shouldn’t be forced into bankruptcy to do it. What do you think the ruling should be?


What Does The Every Child Succeeds Act Mean For Public Schools?

The discussions began the minute President Obama signed the Every Child Succeeds Act back in 2015.


The act is a stark opposite to Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act. The new act will go into effect the start of the new school year beginning in 2017 and will give educators a unique opportunity to try new ways of reaching student’s potential.


The most talked about aspect of this new act is that it allows the school leaders the power to create their own measure of success. The act was built around the idea that every educational system is unique and has different issues.


Of course, educators from struggling schools see this as a chance to finally find a way to help their students succeed academically. They will no longer have to cater their curriculum around quarterly standardized testing, Instead, they will be able to teach their students in whatever style seems to work for the specific demographic of their particular school.


So, how will schools deal with this new change when the time comes? Some teachers argue that while the new act has great potential, educational leaders might not be open from allowing teachers to deviate from the curriculum that has been used for years. This could hinder any progress to be made from the new measures.


It is important to note that schools will still have to report student’s progress, especially those that are considered undeserved, such as special education students. Schools will also need to create goals and report on the progress they have made to reaching them throughout the school year.


It will be interesting to see how the new measures will play out in public school districts across the country.



Public Education in Arizona Set for Change with Proposed Law

At his first official address for 2017, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey delivered a substantial portion of his speech to talking about Proposition 123, which is considered by many to be a reform of the state’s school system.


The amendments and improvements being proposed include a new funding system that would stay ahead of the looming inflation. This new financial system would not require an increase in taxes; however, it only guarantees adequate funding for the next few years. Log-term funding would have to be tackled by the next Governor, who may very well be Ducey if he seeks reelection.


What is interesting about Proposition 123 is how it intends to obtain funds to cover public education: Arizona is one of a handful of states that has a public Land Trust that can serve as a source of funding. Proposition 123 calls for active management of the State Land Trust so that all the revenue earned goes back into the trust for reinvestment.


Prior to the introduction of Proposition 123, the Arizona public school system used to receive 2.5 percent of the State Land Trust, currently valued at $5 billion. The new law increases that rate to 6.9 percent. What is important about this reform is that the Land Trust managers must be very skilled in keeping it profitable. The Wall Street climate of 2016 certainly helped in this regard, but this is not a guarantee for 2017.


With the new reforms in place, Arizona now has plenty of money to ensure that all public schools can provide textbooks to their students. Proposition 123 also guarantees raises in the salaries of Arizona teachers; all the same, these raises may not be enough to prevent educators from fleeing to neighboring states such as California and Colorado, where the are bound to earn more.

Free Tuition for New York Students

The state of New York has unveiled a plan that will make college free for middle class and low-income students.


On Tuesday, January 10, Governor Andrew Cuomo pledged to get rid of tuition fees for students from families that earn $125,000 or less per year. This proposed plan, known as the Excelsior Scholarship, would be applicable at state and city universities in the state. Community colleges would also be eligible.


Throughout the 2016 presidential election, college tuition was an issue that galvanized many younger voters. Citing the high cost of tuition and the economic stress it places on many families, Cuomo believes that the Excelsior Scholarship is a necessary form of aid. When unveiling the plan, he compared graduating college with thousands of dollars of debt to “starting a race with an anchor tied to your leg.”


The proposed plan was revealed at LaGuardia Community College. Governor Cuomo was joined by Bernie Sanders, who stressed the importance of free tuition when he ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016. Sanders said that the Excelsior Scholarship was a “revolutionary” idea. He also noted that if the plan succeeds, many other states might follow.


This isn’t the first time free tuition proposals have gained a foothold on the state level. Tennessee, for example, provides students with free access to two-year community college. The Excelsior Scholarship is the first plan, however, that aims to give students free access to four-year institutions.


The program would work by supplementing existing grant programs, and to implement it would cost the state approximately $163 million. Governor Cuomo hopes to get the scholarship program off the ground without haste. The state of New York is currently planning a three-year roll out. When it is enacted in 2019, as many as 200,000 students may qualify for free tuition.



The Importance Of Cleaning Your Colon with


Cleaning out your colon and digestive tract might be more important than you think. If you have eaten a SAD (Standard American Diet) for a large portion of your life, chances are your body is loaded with undigested food and could greatly use a cleanse program. The full body cleanse by can help you achieve a cleaner body and colon.

The Full Body Cleanse is a 20 day program that is to be followed for at least 20 days or longer depending on your specific goals and needs. It is a tablet formula that is to be used in conjunction with a modified diet. It gently sweeps toxins out of the colon using a variety of different herbs and ingredients. These include but are not limited to senna leaf, cascara sagrada, activated charcoal and bentonite clay. The senna leaf works as a gentle laxative while the activated charcoal absorbs toxins. After completing the cleanse you can expect to lose 10 to 30 pounds of excess weight. Some people have as much as 15 pounds of waste inside of their colons alone.

Benefits experienced from cleaning your colon with Dherbs are endless. You will have more energy, mental clarity, reduced sugar cravings and a stronger immune system. Many sickness start from the colon and once this organ has been cleaned you will be less likely to get sick. You will notice better skin and sleep as well.

If you are seeking weight loss, offers an array of products that can be used with the Full Body Cleanse to help you achieve your weight loss goals. Their Metabolism Booster is one of their most popular products because it contains a highly effective herbal fusion formula that can curb the appetite and increase your basal metabolic rate. Adults can take up to 3 capsules a day and it is safe enough for over weight children to take as well.

In conclusion, offers a variety of products that can help you achieve your weight loss and health goals from the inside out, including recipes for healthy eating. Successfully completing the cleansing program has countless benefits and can jump start any weight loss program.

For more reading, check out CEO AD Dolphin’s 5 tips for healthier eating.

Litigation Done Right in Pennsylvania

Hire expert litigator Karl Heideck

Hire Karl Heideck for expert litigation in Pennsylvania

Sometimes, we have to resort to the courts in order to settle a legal matter. For times like these we need the advice of a good legal counselor. In particular, we are in need of a litigator.

There are many areas lawyers can specialize in. Each area of expertise requires years of dedication and practice to master. This is why it is so important to choose an experienced litigator when pursuing a legal matter that must be resolved in a courtroom.

Karl Heideck has the education and a proven track record to be considered one of the best in the business of litigation. After finishing his undergraduate at Swarthmore College, receiving a Bachelor of Arts in English Language and Literature/Letters, he later graduated from Temple University’s James E. Beasley School of Law, receiving his Juris Doctorate in 2009. Karl Heideck’s experience is what is truly impressive.

As an Associate at Conrad O’Brien, Karl Heideck spent 8 months racking up wins representing corporate and individual clients in commercial litigation matters. From there, he spent the better part of 4 years at Pepper Hamilton LLP as a Project Attorney. Karl Heideck specialized in quality control reviews. Additionally, he reviewed and prepared materials for pharmaceutical, white collar defense, and bankruptcy litigation. Currently, Heideck serves as a contract attorney for Hire Counsel. Here, Karl focuses on reviewing discoveries for high level banking and securities litigation.

Karl Heideck’s record speaks for itself. When we find ourselves turning to the courtroom to resolve a legal matter, we should contact Karl Heideck for counsel. He continues to show a successful record representing both corporate and individual clients for almost 10 years. The combination of his experience and training allow Karl to navigate even the most complex of cases.